What significant requirement was established by the case of Miranda v. Arizona?

The case of Miranda v. Arizona established the significant requirement that individuals in custody must be informed of their rights before being subjected to interrogation. This includes the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present. The core purpose of this requirement is to protect suspects from self-incrimination, ensuring that they fully understand their legal rights during the interrogation process.

By mandating Miranda warnings, the Supreme Court aimed to uphold the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. This ruling reinforces the idea that fair treatment in the legal system begins at the moment a person is taken into custody, highlighting the importance of informed consent before any questioning takes place. The requirement for Miranda warnings has since become a fundamental aspect of law enforcement procedures across the United States, ensuring that individuals are aware of their rights during critical moments of legal interaction.