Which case reaffirmed the limitations on police conduct regarding searches and seizures?

The case that reaffirmed the limitations on police conduct regarding searches and seizures is Terry v. Ohio. This landmark decision established the legal standard for "stop and frisk" procedures, emphasizing that police officers must have a reasonable suspicion that a person is involved in criminal activity before stopping and searching them.

In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court recognized the balance between an individual's Fourth Amendment rights and the need for law enforcement to ensure their safety and prevent crime. The ruling allowed law enforcement officers to perform brief stops and conduct limited searches for weapons, provided they have a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts.

This case laid the groundwork for subsequent interpretations of the law concerning searches and seizures, reinforcing the necessity for law enforcement to operate within constitutional boundaries while also addressing public safety concerns. The decision effectively tempered police power in a manner that upholds citizens' rights, making it a pivotal case in the area of criminal procedure.